This case was centered around whether or not LSPD Cadet Derrick Wilson was at fault for the damage to both the property and persons of multiple BLMC members. The case claims he was driving on the wrong side of the road around a blind corner, running into the BLMC public ride.
As it’s a civil case, it relies on something called the ‘preponderance of evidence.’ This is a fancy way of saying that the plaintiffs (BLMS, the people suing) have to present evidence that is more credible or convincing than what the defense (the PD, represented by the DOJ) are presenting. In the State of San Andreas, this burden is set at 51%, meaning the plaintiffs have to be 1% more convincing than the defense.
My friend Winnie (who works for the PDO) explained it as, it has to be more likely than not that the incident happened, so that’s what the judge has to work out. It’s basically just which story makes the most sense, and which is the most likely as backed by evidence.
Final Verdict:
Not yet released
Stay tuned to Weazel News for updates on the final verdict.
Pingback: Stella’s Scoops Volume 67 – Weazel News – New Day RP